Letter of Credit in Russian Bankruptcy: Funds and Refunds

Short answerThe fate of letter-of-credit funds depends on the instrument type, the movement of cover, documentary compliance and which participant became insolvent. A covered credit transfers cover to the executing bank, while an uncovered credit uses another reimbursement mechanism. The full instrument, statements and presented documents are essential.

Documentary payment

The bank checks presented documents against the credit terms.

Three insolvency scenarios

Applicant, beneficiary and participating-bank insolvency create different risks.

Trace the cover

Actual transfer, account, bank and timing determine the analysis.

Civil Code rules checked on 21 October 2026. The amount example is hypothetical.

Who entered insolvency

Scenario	Main question	Evidence
Applicant	Whether cover moved before the relevant restriction	Opening date, credit type, fund flow and return terms
Beneficiary	Whether conditions were met before expiry	Documents, presentation date and payment basis
Bank	Which bank owes which obligation	Issuing, executing and confirming roles and cover

Under Civil Code Article 867 the issuing bank pays upon presentation of stipulated documents. A covered credit places cover at the executing bank’s disposal for the instrument term, but the precise account structure and bank-insolvency rules still matter.

A letter of credit does not guarantee the underlying transaction. It reduces payment risk only where terms and documents are precise. Quality disputes usually remain separate from the bank’s documentary examination.

Cover and confirmation are different

“Covered” concerns funding; “confirmed” adds another bank’s obligation. Under Civil Code Article 870, a confirming bank is jointly and severally liable with the issuing bank to the beneficiary within the confirmed amount. Obtain the actual confirmation notice and terms: a second bank’s involvement alone is not confirmation.

For amendments, check the confirming bank’s consent. Without it, that bank remains bound on the original terms. This matters when identifying the correct debtor and amount in a demand or register claim.

Presentation deadline and five working days for examination

Article 871(2) gives the bank at most five working days from receipt of documents to examine them and decide on payment or refusal. This is an examination period, not five extra days to present documents after expiry. Keep evidence of when, how and which documents were delivered.

Under Article 873, expiry does not close the credit where documents were presented within its validity period. Timely presentation therefore matters separately from payment or bankruptcy dates. If discrepancies arise, obtain the bank’s written decision and exact list of non-conformities.

Trace the return of unused cover

Under Article 873(3), unused funds return to the issuing bank when the credit closes, and that bank credits the applicant’s account from which they were deposited. Obtain evidence of both movements. A statement that the credit is closed does not itself prove that the applicant received the balance.

Hypothetical reconciliation: cover 4,000,000 ₽ less documented payments of 3,200,000 ₽ leaves 800,000 ₽ unused. The equation only checks arithmetic. Entitlement and insolvency treatment require separate analysis; do not count the same balance as both paid to the beneficiary and returned to the applicant.

What to request from the bank in writing

For letter of credit [number, date], please confirm its type and each bank’s role, cover transfer, document receipt dates, payments, closure ground and date, unused balance and return records. Identify the obligation and amount remaining unpaid to [applicant/beneficiary].

Identify your role and authority, attach available records and retain delivery evidence. The response helps identify the obligor; it does not replace timely documentary presentation or a properly filed claim.

Review workflow

Identify the structure

Establish revocability, cover, confirmation, banks, amount and expiry.

Trace the funds

Collect available statements from the applicant and participating banks.

Review presentation

Check the required list, delivery channel, deadline, discrepancies and notices.

Classify the claim

Identify the payment or refund debtor and the register or current-claim regime.

Documents

application and full credit terms;
underlying contract and amendments;
cover-transfer statements;
documents presented for payment;
payment, refusal and closure notices;
bankruptcy publications for the relevant participant.

FAQ

Is covered cash always outside the applicant’s estate?

No automatic answer applies; actual transfer, fund status, terms and timing must be reviewed.

Does the bank investigate the whole transaction?

Normally it examines documents against the credit terms while the underlying dispute remains separate.

What happens to unused cover?

Civil Code Article 873 and the instrument terms govern closure and return, subject to insolvency effects.

Can a claim be filed against a bank?

Yes where that bank owes the unperformed obligation, subject to its role and the special bank-insolvency regime.

Does any second bank confirm the letter of credit?

No. Obtain an actual confirmation notice and check its amount, conditions and treatment of amendments under Article 870.

Are five working days added after expiry for presentation?

No. Article 871 sets a bank examination period after receipt; the instrument’s presentation requirements and validity period must still be observed.

Official sources

Need to determine the fate of cover and the claim route?

Initial consultation

Letters of Credit in Russian Bankruptcy: Funds, Payment and Claims