Lawyer Pavel PetrovLawyer Pavel Petrov

RURU ENEN

Court Fees and Costs of a Russian Corporate Bankruptcy

In briefCorporate bankruptcy costs are not a single package price. They include the court fee, insolvency practitioner remuneration, disclosures, auctions, valuation, storage and other evidenced steps. In 2026 a corporate applicant seeking another debtor’s bankruptcy pays RUB 100,000, while the debtor’s own petition carries no court fee. This payment must be kept separate from the statutory deposit and the case’s actual budget.

Mandatory items

Court, disclosure and statutory actions form the base budget.

Variable costs

Valuation, auctions, storage and specialists depend on the assets and complexity.

Applicant risk

Article 59 may place qualifying uncovered costs on the applicant.

What makes up the cost?

GroupExamplesCost driver
Court expensesState fee and separate-dispute costsApplicant and claims considered
Administrator remunerationFixed and statutory percentage componentsProcedure, service period and result
DisclosureEFRSB and statutory official publicationsProcedures, auctions and required notices
Asset workValuation, security, storage, inventory and auctionsAsset type, location and condition
Retained personsAuditor, valuer, registrar, platform operator and specialistsNecessity, workload, caps and court approval
AdministrationPostage, archives, banking, communications and recordsCompany size and duration
A lawyer’s commercial quote is not the same as procedure expenses. Representation of the applicant or creditor is a separate service. Only statutory and justified case costs are charged to the estate.

Court fee for a corporate bankruptcy application

Since 8 September 2024, a corporate applicant seeking another debtor’s bankruptcy pays a RUB 100,000 court fee; an individual applicant pays RUB 10,000. No fee is charged when the debtor files its own bankruptcy application. Applications and claims made inside an existing bankruptcy case are generally charged at 50% of the fee otherwise applicable to that type of claim.

FilingPosition as at August 2026Check before payment
A corporate applicant seeks another debtor’s bankruptcyRUB 100,000Applicant status, exemptions and court details
An individual applicant seeks the debtor’s bankruptcyRUB 10,000Who is formally named as applicant
The company debtor files its own applicationNo court feeThat the filing is genuinely the debtor’s own petition
Ancillary application or claim within the case50% of the fee for the relevant claim typeMonetary or non-monetary character and any exemption
Do not use the obsolete RUB 300 and RUB 6,000 figures. Check the current Tax Code, the applicant’s status and payment details before filing. The court fee is separate from the statutory deposit and the case’s actual procedural costs.

Article 20.7 rules

Article 20.7 of Federal Law No. 127-FZ generally places procedure expenses on the debtor’s funds and regulates retained specialists. Actual costs of a mandatory valuer, registrar, auditor or electronic-platform operator are considered separately. Other retained persons are subject to limits linked to the balance-sheet value of assets, and exceeding a limit requires a court order.

A creditors’ meeting cannot charge every additional service to the estate. Where creditors themselves approve an extra person beyond necessary statutory work, the law contains a separate funding rule for those voting in favour.

Who pays if the estate is insufficient?

Article 59 first places court expenses, publications and administrator remuneration on the debtor’s property. If funds are insufficient, the applicant must cover the statutory uncovered part, except the percentage remuneration. A special exception applies where the applicant is an employee or former employee.

A creditor should therefore examine assets, receivables, avoidable transactions, funding capacity and termination risk before filing. See the separate guide to creditor funding of a bankruptcy procedure.

Payment priority

Article 134 establishes the priority of current claims. Court expenses, statutory publication, administrator remuneration and costs connected with mandatory work receive the priority provided by law. Truly extraordinary expenditure needed to prevent technological or environmental danger and loss of life is protected by a separate rule.

Priority does not remove the reasonableness test. Documents must show the connection to the case, actual performance, price and funding source.

Budgeting checklist

  1. Identify the likely procedure: observation, financial rehabilitation, external administration or liquidation.
  2. Calculate fixed remuneration by role and service period.
  3. Prepare a calendar of mandatory publications and meetings.
  4. Inventory assets, security interests, branches and archives.
  5. Estimate security, storage, valuation and platform needs.
  6. Separate disputes, receivable recovery and transaction avoidance.
  7. Map monthly funding and a reserve for unforeseen work.
  8. Do not book percentage remuneration as a guaranteed amount.

See the current roles and fixed figures in insolvency practitioner remuneration and the final-stage process in corporate liquidation proceedings.

Which expenses may be challenged?

A participant may challenge the reasonableness of retaining a person or the fee amount. The court examines the need for expertise, workload, qualifications, market price and whether the administrator could perform the function. To exceed a statutory cap, the administrator must prove necessity and price to the court.

An effective objection identifies the contract and period, the retained person, work allegedly completed, supporting evidence and why the task or price was unreasonable.

Frequently asked questions

Does a company pay the court fee when filing for its own bankruptcy?

No. The debtor’s own petition is exempt, but the statutory deposit and other case expenses remain separate.

Is there one corporate-bankruptcy price?

No. Assets, procedures, auctions, disputes and duration produce different budgets.

Is remuneration part of the costs?

It is a case expense but is calculated under Article 20.6 and should not be mixed with actual outlays.

Who pays for an assetless company?

Article 59 may shift qualifying uncovered costs to the applicant, subject to statutory exceptions.

May any specialist be retained at the debtor’s expense?

No. Necessity, connection to duties, reasonable price and statutory caps matter.

Can the final amount be fixed in advance?

Only a scenario estimate is realistic. Assets, disputes, auctions and extensions change the total.

Official sources

Need to estimate a company case budget?

We can map procedures, assets and payment sources without promising a fixed final price.

Initial consultation