Lawyer Pavel PetrovLawyer Pavel Petrov

RURU ENEN

Removal of a Russian Insolvency Administrator

In briefRemoval of a Russian insolvency administrator is not a way to replace an inconvenient professional merely because the parties disagree. The court tests a specific breach, the applicant’s affected rights, consequences and proportionality. Article 20.4 provides the general framework and Article 145 sets rules for a liquidation receiver.

Court decision

A creditor body, SRO or eligible case participant relies on a statutory ground.

Concrete facts

Dates, duties, records, consequences and the link to the applicant’s rights are required.

Not every breach

A minor defect without material harm may be insufficient on its own.

Release and removal differ

MechanismGroundMeaning
ReleaseThe administrator’s application or another statutory eventTermination without a necessary finding of misconduct
Removal on complaintImproper performance, affected rights and statutory consequencesCourt response to a proven failure
Creditor-initiated removalA motion of the meeting or committee where the statute permitsCourt appointment of a replacement
SRO or disqualification routeSpecial grounds under Article 20.4Loss of required status or another statutory event

What an application should show

  1. Case number, procedure and appointment period.
  2. Applicant’s standing and affected right.
  3. The exact duty and legal provision.
  4. The act or omission, dates and records.
  5. Actual or possible losses and other consequences.
  6. Requested relief and served supporting documents.
General distrust is not evidence. A dispute about one report, expense or notice should explain why the defect matters to the procedure and the applicant’s rights.

Proportionality

The Supreme Court’s review of 11 October 2023 explains that immaterial breaches causing no significant harm and no doubt about good faith, independence or competence should not automatically result in removal. Other statutory circumstances may require replacement regardless of the overall quality of work.

After the order

A removal order is immediately enforceable and may be appealed. The court appoints a new administrator under Law No. 127-FZ. Reversal does not automatically restore the former administrator. Transfer of records, assets and access should be documented.

Frequently asked questions

Can one creditor apply?

Yes where it has standing and proves a statutory ground.

Must the SRO be approached first?

Not in every case; court and disciplinary routes have different purposes.

Is a late notice enough?

The court assesses duration, reason, consequences and materiality.

Can damages be claimed too?

Potentially, but a money claim has separate elements of proof.

Is the administrator restored after reversal?

Article 20.4 excludes automatic restoration in relevant situations.

Official sources

Related guides: administrator liability, administrator SROs and case participants.

Need to assess a removal ground?

We can compare the alleged breach, records and consequences with current law and practice without guaranteeing an outcome.

Initial consultation